OPEN LETTER TO FRANKLIN GRAHAM, on the grounds of asking him, what is mean by….

Some years ago, I wrote to your father Mr. Billy Graham with the question; what he mean by saying on front page of his magazine Decision; at Christmas time, …Jesus The Everlasting Father with out beginning of days or end of life. And at the end of his writing a plea to the reader to accept Jesus as Everlasting Father. And my question was: “since when are you preaching that”? He did not answer me directly but commissioned somebody else to answer me in his place saying: “Mr. Graham did not mean that Jesus was The Everlasting Father; but that Jesus acted as a loving father…”

After some time passed by, another letter was written to Mr. Billy Graham; asking him: …It is true that at the end of your Crusade in Saint Louis Missouri; a gentleman approach you with this question: Mr. Graham what you do with Acts 2:38? And your response was: “I do not understand Acts 2:38 I only preach what The Lord send me to preach that a sinner can be saved by believing in him.” This time the answer was a “gift” nothing else, no a word. What is mean by that? It seems to me that The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association been lead by you; I think, is still; on the anomalous of saying one thing but meaning different? I say that because at the time of the inauguration of one of the Bush Presidents, when you were the person to offer prayer for the President; your prayer finished saying …I ask in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. And because some people later on criticized you for that; on a TV interview you denied it saying …I prayed in the name of Jesus. At that time, I was to write to you; but because I had not hear the beginning of the interview I declined; thinking; what he mean by that? I am in the position to let you know that using that “phraseology” at any religious ceremony; it is repeating a 1900 years old pagan oral tradition invented by pagan philosopher pre Catholic Father Justin martyr; before “it” was interpolated at the ending of Matthew’s gospel.

Now, on February 7, 2013 you mailed a general letter to me about a nationwide project; as the largest evangelistic outreach ever in the U.S.A. the outreach will be having church at the home and inviting friends and relatives to it just like the centurion Cornelius in Acts 10 did. About “that” gathering 11? 13YOU wrote:

“The Bible tells about a Roman centurion named Cornelius who gathered family and friends at his home so they could hear Peter tell them about Jesus. As Peter spoke, the Holy Spirit opened hearts and many in the room responded.” That, Mr. Franklin Graham sounds very nice; but not everything that shines is gold. I will write as “it” really happen. V.6 Cornelius was told by an angel of God to call Peter to his home to hear from him …what thou oughtest to do.(…obedience to the faith… …faith without works is dead). V.42 Peter preaching: And he (Jesus) commanded us to preach unto the people and testify that it is he which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick and dead. V.43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. V.44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. V.46 For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God, then Peter answered Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? V.48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord.

It is easy for me to see that Your way of presenting this glorious happening is quite different, see my point: the angel told Cornelius “what thou oughtest to do.” You said: the Holy Spirit opened hearts. The writer of Acts said the Holy Ghost fell on them all; you said many in the room responded. The writer of Acts said all of them that received the Holy Ghost spoke with tongues; you took away from the real happening!! Peter said …through the name of Jesus whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins..as Peter was speaking the outpouring of the Holy Ghost took place. You omitted that part of Salvation message; because you do not believe that? It happen as at the beginning of the Church; same experience. and were commanded and they obeyed the command to be baptized in the precious Name of Jesus. They all were Gentiles and they were baptized in the name of the Lord; just as they were baptized in the beginning of the Jewish Church. Do you command your Gentile audiences to be baptized in The Name of The Lord? Do you hear them speak in tongues at your meetings? You changed the label of it, and knowingly; you wrote you own label of it to support the mental concept on orthodoxy of our days; and making the writer of Acts of the Apostles appear as the writer of the way you described. Twisting Apostolic writings, is not a new thing, it began long ago; and Christianity has not been the same since then; the real Apostolic happenings about remission of sins were twisted, and even at later years; a known Theologian dared to imply that Saul was baptized in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. But the Apostolic writing shows the reality of that baptism! Acts 22:16. Twisting a Scripture in this case, do not do it, it is not the real thing with me, it never has; it never will.