Something of the King James Bible translation, a few years before and a few years after 1611.
(more of the Trinity foundation dug out)
Before the 16th. Century, England was witnessing a great impact of a Doctrine. At that time it became known
as The Doctrine of The Quakers, the doctrine adopted by WILLIAM PENN who spelled from England became the founder of Pennsylvania
State in America. Their slogan was “ The Christian religion is the way of attaining eternal life which God had pointed
out by Jesus Christ, and it may be learned in the Holy Scriptures, especially in the New Testament”. ( …build
upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; in whom all the building
fitly framed together growth unto a holy temple in the Lord. In whom ye also are build together for a habitation of God through
the Spirit.)
That doctrine was not only a thorn in the flesh to the English men who had received the Romish teachings from Father Agustine
(who testified to the English) …the writings of Plato gave me the knowledge of the true God, (the plurality of gods
in unity, that is) but also to the Calvinist believers, and them of the Society of the Trinity and even to King James Himself.
Please, compare where the two teachings came from.
In 1593 The One God believers were accused of “ …the horrible blasphemies and devilish teachings of these Heretics…to
say that the eternal generation of the Son to be against reason…
Here it is what was preached at that time, “Jesus was truly a mortal man while he lived on the earth, but at the
same time the only-begotten Son of God; being conceived of the Holy Spirit, born of a virgin.
…he was distinguished for the perfect holiness of his life, endued with divine wisdom and power, was sent by the
Father with supreme authority on an embassy to mankind, By his resurrection, he was begotten a second time, and became like
God, immortal. (Acts 13:22-29, Rom. 1:2-4, Col. 1:18, Rev. 1:15, Acts 26:23,
1st. Cor.15:20, John 5:26, Rom. 6:9, John 12:34, 2nd. Tim.1:10, Rev. 1:18.
At the beginning of 1611, a so called Protestant commission was busy issuing threats of death by public burning Anti-Trinity
believers; then Trinitarians both Catholics and Protestants united themselves to carry on in those crimes against their Oneness
brethren. In 1604 a Puritan Trinitarian Scholar Dr. John Reynolds in a closed conference at Hampton Court Palace, have made
a sly suggestion to King James that a new translation of the present honest translated Bibles: Bishops Bible, Geneva Bible
and the called Great Bible, was needed of which bibles, The Queen had ordered “one copy to each church of England to
be read to the believers, and one copy to each Bishop for personal reading; the King agreed to the sly suggestion and the
work for a new translation that was not needed; furthermore, it was a translation based on the catholic grounds of Douay-Rheims
N.T. which was a literal translation from the Vulgate Bible; the official Bible of the Catholic Church; the very one bible
suspected of Theological errors; corrections promised but never done to our days! It began taking about 7 years to completion
and began to be popularized at 1611.
1611 -12 The last One God preachers burnt was on April 1st. Edward Wightman burnt in Lichfield. Queen Elizabeth
hearing of it said, She was very sorrowful hearing that there were such Monsters in her Kingdom;
King James had visited the preacher (unknown reason) and ended their conversation by spurning him with his foot; the King
could had mercy on adulterous favorites…but could not have none to a honest preacher- business man who had lived a blameless
life.
1612 After all that, King James declared that believers like that “…hereafter should waste themselves away
in prison instead of the public execution”. Though the King authorized the New Translation of the Holy Scriptures, yet
he had rejected the One God who inspired such Scriptures! How about that?
A popular singing at that time: Talk of essence, and substance,
And no one knows what!
God either made Jesus, or else He did not.
If made, Jesus is a CREATURE, without more ado;
If not, Jesus is a God-and then there is TWO?
