TRUTH, IN TRUTH, BY TRUTH, INTO TRUTH (And the digging up continue!)
TRUTH: …in Jesus are hid all treasures of wisdom and knowledge. Col.2:3.
Matthew wrote the gospel of Jesus in Hebrew text unto the members of his Jewish congregation.
Catholic historians said that “it” was translated to Greek text after the Council in Jerusalem (60 A.D.) the
time Matthew left to Ethiopia and died as a martyr there, his Hebrew writing got lost “ … but the translation
to Greek is in substantial conformity with the original…” they said that.
However, in 110 A.D. The original writing of Matthew’s gospel was found in Cochin India, among a congregation of
Jewish believers who have received Matthew’s writing from Barnabas a time he visited them. A few years later, Apostle
Thomas visited them and held many baptisms (Acts 2:38). And ordained a Minister for them. Because bloody persecutions, this
congregation was dispersed and dissolved.
Around 300 A.D. Historian Eusebious, found the gospel of Matthew in the Library of Caesarea, he was a pre-Catholic Bishop
doing commentaries about the Scriptures and quoting the Lord Jesus in his book THE DEMOSTRATIO, seven times he quotes Matt.
28:19 as follow “Go and make disciples of all the nations
teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” Notice that nothing was said about
baptizing… WHY? No interpolation yet!!!
After the Trinity doctrine was completed from their invention 381 A. D. And since the Emperor had granted the “new
priesthood judicial powers” a confiscation of any writings on Hebrew characters took place in Rome from Jewish homes
and places of religious matters (can the reader guess why??) this action was well alive in 1553 when a Hebrew manuscript of
Matthew that have been confiscated from a ravished Jewish place, was found by a Bishop from Briew, that was in France, and
in Church business visiting Rome in those days, and his astonishment was great as he noticed on a garbage basked an “Hebrew
manuscript of Matthew among other Hebrew manuscripts.” He asked permission to take the manuscript of Matthew, which
apparently he reproduced it (1555 A. D.) and deposited it to the library of Paris and is there as Hebrew manuscript (The Gospel
of Matthew according to primitive Hebrew Text).
The older Hebrew manuscript from which the reproduction was made, it is said that his early date could be as early as 400
A.D. Only few years from the council of Nicea 325 A.D. the time when the original writing of Matthew was “mutilated
at it’s ending” at the library. And fewer years from Constantinople’s Council 381 A.D. the days when Pope
Damasus 1 ordered the “gathering of Apostolic Epistles to study and choose which were to form the Catholic New Testament;
Greek and then Latin as it is known today; it was there and then that the interpolation of words about baptism in the titles
in Matthew’s writing occurred; but it seems that about the commandment of The Lord Jesus without the words “Baptizing
them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost” (Hebrew Text) was not noticed until 1901
from there to now 2014, few scholars knew about it, some mentioned it in one way or another, watered it down; some completely
willingly ignored to make mention of it; as well known Prof. Lightfoot, who made comments in Eusebious writings calling him
“The Father of Church History” nevertheless said absolutely nothing about Matthew’s gospel lack of the baptismal
formula. (that say something about the Trinitarian Scholars.)
I am one; no an scholar, neither Trinitarian; of very few that dares to put this reality of truth in the open as a naked
truth and reality. A copy of the very first Hebrew Manuscript of the gospel of Matthew with the English translation is in
my possession and I thank The Lord Jesus for it.
Now then, I will try to put in clear words as I may can once more; the “the main reason for the invention”
of plurality of Deities from where was developed the believing of a triune God.
The Apostles Paul, John and Peter, wrote about some developing in the Christian Community to be done in their future days
by some …false brethren… Paul said to the Ephesian Church “Also of your own selves shall men arise,
speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.” Pulled out from the Apostles’ Doctrine, false
brethren preached perverse things about Jesus and his work at calvary’s cross in nice words which are “light
turned to darkness.” And …the cross of Christ became of none effect… to them; that, is in effect in
our days: departed from the Apostles’ Doctrine one is on the same route that the false brethren! John wrote of a “false
brother” and others; (he) “prating against us (the Apostles) with malicious words…” “…
many deceivers are entered into the world… They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us,
they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of
us.” (clear put Apostle John, thanks so much. The same to Peter)
Peter wrote “But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among
you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them…”
IN TRUTH: “And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth (Apostles’ Doctrine)
shall be evil spoken off” And even in his own time he knew of some “false brethren” twisting some of the
writings of Apostle Paul 2nd. Peter 3:16. Since all this were already going on the 1st. century, common
sense tell us that “they continued and increased through following centuries” IT DID HAPPEN!
Beginning of 2nd. Century: A Jew Priest studying Greek Philosophy in Alexandria, did exactly what Peter prophesied “denying
the Lord that bought them” first Priest to teach that the word, WORD (John.1:1) was a separated being along side of
God. From there, pagan Greeks, the Gnostics, and SO CALLED CHRISTIAN PLATONISTS, BEGAN TO TEACH THAT THE “WORD”
(LOGOS) WAS GOD THE WORD, WHICH IN TURN BECAME KNOWN AS GOD THE SON, ETERNAL SON AND FINALLY, SECOND PERSON OF THE TRINITY
ETERNALLY BY THE FATHER’S SIDE. (false, he was in the bosom of the Father.) John 1:18. False brethren invent or repeat
false doctrines! As “it” can be seen!
By then, false brother Simon; the one that …bewitched the people of Samaria…and offered money to Peter for
him to receive also the Holy Ghost… Many years later he confronted the Apostle again and told him; …in Genesis
says, “and God said Let us” that shows that there were at least two Gods. And the plurality of gods preaching
began with this false brother, to whom was denied the gift of the Holy Spirit baptism! Have you the reader, repeated them
words? The words of a false brother whose “heart was not right before God”
Of course, with the road been paved, Justin a false brother philosopher; began to speak of ANOTHER GOD (another Jesus,
that is) ALONG SIDE THE UNBEGOTTEN FATHER; AND REPEATADLY SPOKE OF THE “ WORD AS A SECOND GOD” (first God Unbegotten,
second God Begotten; see BEGOTTEN GOD) Parallel N.T. Greek and English.
Next is Tertullian a Platonist brother and a primitive Church Father; one of the architects of the invented trinity who
made the statement “…EVEN IF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES ASSERTED THAT THERE HAD BEEN A VISIBLE APPEARANCE OF GOD THE
FATHER, I WOULD NOT PERSONALLY BELIEVE IT.” so, he did not believe 1st Tim. 3:16 …God was manifested
in the flesh… How about that!
Following same philosophy of false brotherhood is Ignatius saying “ There is one physician composed of flesh and
spirit, generated and ingenerated, God and man, authentic life in death, from Mary and from God, first passible and then impassible,
Jesus Christ our Lord.” He certainly did not got those words: INGENERATED and IMPASSIBLE from Apostle John as disciple
of his, but he got that from the Greek philosophical minds that were changing the nature of the Jewish Messiah. (God manifested
in the flesh) Maybe John was thinking about Ignatius and Policarp when he wrote “…went out from us…”
By that time the teaching of the LOGOS/WORD, as an EMISARY OF THE FATHER, as Tertullian believed that the Father was no
about to subject himself to suffering; (unfeeling) and Ignatius teaching that Divinity was IMPASSIBLE, was became popular
(late 2nd Century) and then “them” who refused this NEW DOCTRINE were called “heretics”.
Heretics? For knowing that their God was “…full of compassion..” John wrote about His God “Hereby
perceive we the love of God, that He laid down His life for us.” This is the Deity that Apostle Paul wrote “…because
He could not swear by a greater, He swear by HIMSELF” it was His will to become human in order to redeem by His blood
His fallen creatures; blood that He did not had except by becoming human. = God with us= God in us= Christ in us the hope
of glory.
“ …Having made known unto us the MYSTERY OF HIS WILL, ACCORDING TO HIS PLEASURE WHICH HE HATH PURPOSED IN HIMSELF.”
“…BEING PREDESTINATED ACCORDING TO THE PURPOSE OF HIM WHO WORKED ALL THINGS AFTER THE COUNSEL OF HIS OWN WILL.”
That is: gave us understanding to know Him
in His Son. 1st. John 3:20. (Know Him on One Person, not on three persons, that is)
Paul wrote to the Corintian brethren. “… I am with you in my spirit…” does that make two persons?
Was Paul’s spirit another person of Paul? Paul gave his word to them saying “…in the name of the Lord,
I am with you” Was his word another person of him? As funny as it appears, “them false brethren of Greek philosophy
minds” began to believe that God and His Word were two persons, and one hundred years later, they believed ALSO THAT
GOD AND HIS SPIRIT WERE TWO PERSONS! SO “THEY” BEGAN TO SPEAK THAT GOD EXISTED ETERNALLY AS THREE DIVIVE PERSONS.
And the warfare of teaching “new strange beliefs” by false brethren began and it is a mental concept of orthodoxy
even today!
They knew the Hebrew writings in Isaiah 9:6 “…a child is born a son is given. On whose shoulder shall be THE
RULE, and his name shall be called the ANGEL of Great COUNSEL, Prince of Peace, Mighty God, the Potentate, the FATHER OF THE
AGE TO COME.” Angel of great Counsel and Father of the age to come, are not popular titles for him now days MUCH LESS
A “BEING” WITH A RULE; but it is the
BY TRUTH: original writing that says that, but oh no, they do not want an Angel with a Rule; that is no grace, they preach
than that, makes the message of salvation dogmatic/legalistic; in O.T. times, God appeared as an Angel at times, and He remained
God, lets keep that in mind. In such fashion He appeared to some Patriarchs been the invisible Deity, unalterable, the only
Almighty God, the HIGHEST of all and the HOLIEST of all, He did change to appear in the form of man in order to “chat”
with a human friend by name Abram; the man with whom He made a BLOOD COVENANT. So He became known as the ANGEL OF THE COVENANT;
and He remained God; He had THAT COVENANT IN MIND LONG BEFORE HE VISITED HIS FRIEND Abram; the Covenant of Circumcision; see
what “this is” as taught by Paul concerning BAPTISM IN THE NAME OF THE LORD JESUS! Acts 2:38.It is clear!
But “the false brethren persisted” on their teaching that God was an “ALOOF BEING, IMPASSIBLE”
for his created word and that could not have been GOD MANIFESTED IN THE FLESH in the Messiah, so “they” made of
the “WORD” (John 1:1) a DUPLICATE OF HIM, that the world may see TWO DIVINE PERSONS; COMPLETELY IGNORING THAT
GOD THE FATHER HAD SAY “YE ARE MY WITNESSES, SAITH THE LORD AND MY SERVANT WHOM I HAVE CHOSEN THAT YE MAY KNOW AND BELIEVE
ME, AND UNDERSTAND THAT I AM “HE”… What could He mean but The “HE” that also Jesus said “
I AM “ HE.” Or if there are two “he? which is the true …I AM HE! It is now days as it was then, few
believers really comprehend who Jesus was then and Who He is now. Am I wrong ?
So, “they” debated among themselves for years if the Father and the Son were of the same “homoousios”
(substance) or not, “they” MADE THE DECISION THAT the Father and the Son, were of the same; but two “hypostasis”
( two different persons). Another Greek Philosopher Christian called Origen began to teach that the Son had been “eternally
begotten” also he was the first to call Jesus “The God Man,” and on the Athanasian Creed read by the Emperor
at Nicea 325 A.D. He read “ begotten before the ages” (whatever that means). The Athanasian Creed was the work
of another pagan philosopher false brother by name Athanasius but it did not said nothing about the three divine persons that
“they” had been talking about for years even baptizing mentioning three persons and immersing three times as Tertullian
mentioned …Three immersions one for each person. And ADMMITING of making somewhat “…AMPLER response that
the Lord appointed in the Gospel… ( Mathew 28:19 what a confession of the interpolation)” So now the NEW DOCTRINE
needed to became official and declared to the open by the Emperor; it needed the power of the Emperor in order to be IMPOSSED!
And imposed it was; but not by authority of The Holy Scriptures, “and false brethren” began saying “Whosoever
would be in a state of salvation, needeth above all things to hold fast the Catholic faith which faith except a man preserve
whole and inviolate without doubt he will perish eternally. And the Catholic faith is this. That we worship one God in trinity
and the Trinity in Unity.” Yes it is the way that happen, no doubt about it, after “they” formulated, adopted,
rejected, reformulated, and adopted again, “they” claimed that the Church under the inspiration of the HOLY SPIRIT
(really?) FORMULATED, THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. FATHERS OF THE CHURCH, COUNCILS, BISHOPS, AND POPES; STUDIED, FORMULATED
AND TRANSMITED IT; and by Emperor Theodotius 1 at the Council of Constantinople it was declared: “Let us believe in
one Godhead consisting of the Father,Son and Holy Ghost of equal majesty IN A HOLY TRINITY…WE COMMAND THAT THE SCRIBERS
TO THIS FAITH TO BE CALLED CATHOLIC CHRISTIANS…WE MARK ALL SENSELESS FOLLOWERS OF OTHER RELIGIONS (APOSTOLIC JEWS AND
GENTILE APOSTOLICS) WITH THE IMFAMOUS TITLE OF HERETICS. 381 A.D. And once upon a time, the Godhead was diverge, as Jesus
was made a part of it! ALL OF THEM FALSE BROTHERHOOD; WERE INVOLVED IN PAGAN PHILOSOPHY which begat the trinity! So it can
be seen that; that kind of “new teaching” was foreign to Jesus and later to his Apostles; therefore introduced
on Christendom at later years.
Modern promoters of the Trinity dogma preach that because “it” is from God, (since when?) “it”
cannot be understood; while others trying to explain it, jiggle assertions from Science, the Hemisphere, Space and Matter,
and UNKNOWN TO THEM, pagan Greek/Egyptian Mythology and Platonic logic and reason!
Their parties were wrong, wrong as Paul said of both the Greek and the Jew; the Greek with their carnal wisdom did not
knew God, while to the Jew, the Rock of Salvation was a rock of confusion to them; as it is now to the Trinitarians everywhere;
they stumble at the word; the printed Word= the spoken Word= the Word that became flesh and said “Blessed is he that
is not offended (CONFOUNDED) IN ME “The Father is in me, and I am in the Father, BELIEVE ME. (same as John 1:1 The Word
was WITH GOD The Father)
INTO TRUTH: To say that in Genesis 1:26 there were two beings, it is repeating what Simon the sorcerer told Peter.To say,
Elohim as a plural word, it denotes two beings because the “us” and “our”. It is Philosophy! God was
with His Word same as the Word /flesh was with the Father in John 14:23 saying “…WE…” “…OUR…”
Yet One Entity; see the plurality actually was/is a SINGLE DEITY! “God in Christ” “The Father in the Son”
“One God and One Mediator…a Mediator not of one; but God is One” Spirit and matter, therefore Jesus
claimed: “I am not alone, the Father is with me” One Entity in all the way.
When a Trinitarian says that Jesus is the Man God eternally begotten he is repeating a 2000+ years old phraseology invented
by the philosopher false brother Origen.
Every time a Trinitarian says that Jesus existed as the Eternal Son of God, is on the same level that half/converted philosopher
false brother Father Justin as he admitted that he could not prove the pre-existence of a least Creator/ Son of God. But he
spoke of “another God alongside the Sole Unbegotten. The Father.” At that time, it was their believe on a “duality,
latter on it became a trinity of gods.”
When a Trinitarian says that the Eternal Son was made flesh, he is denying that …God was manifested in the flesh…and
as Pagan philosopher false brother Tertullian said”… even if the Holy Scripture attested that there is a manifestation
of God the Father in earth, I would not believed.” They shake hands in agreement.
In a recent exchange of “notes” a Trinitarian Preacher told me “Why do you pray to Jesus, when he told
you to pray to the Father in his name? Most religious people know that there are Scriptures that imply such way to pray, right?
There are books written in that subject and I had read few of them, yet even before I became One God believer, I learn to
pray directly to The Lord Jesus now in heaven in His Presence as God in behalf of us…angels and authorities and powers
being made subject unto Him.
Yes Jesus said to pray in his name …if you ask in my name I will do it…, it is his words; praise God; also
it is known that he spoke in parables so some listeners could no understand and be saved. Matt. 13:15. By the same token,
he spoke of the Father in ALLEGORIES “These things have I spoken unto you in allegories.” …ask the Father
in my Name… it is one of them allegories.
We are told that in ancient times, name and person were synonymous Acts 1:15,Rev. 3:4. So, when Jesus said to ask the Father
in his name, what the reason for the allegory? Confounded believers (FALSE BRETHREN, THAT IS) to continued as such; Jesus
stated “…the Father is in me…” and “…no man can come to the Father EXCEPT he comes to
me…” because “The Father is in the Son” that is what Jesus said …ask the Father in my name/person;
to do that ,one talks to the Father in the PERSON OF JESUS “In him and through faith in him we may approach (the
Father) with freedom and confidence.”
The disciples told him, “LO, now speakest no allegories…” Jesus had say to them at the beginning of John
16 about some people “ they have not known the Father nor me.” According to that, “they” didn’t
have life eternal, (confounded believers) At the end of same chapter, he said to them “…and shall leave me alone;
and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.” They KNEW WHAT HE MEANT! He never told them, “The Eternal
Son of God is with me” but The Father is with me; it was the prophecy of Isaiah fulfilled before their eyes: “And
he shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence… 8:14. (To false brethren, that
is) A SANCTUARY! To worship the Father in HIS SANCTUARY to worship Him in Spirit and in truth… or to be confounded/offended
about the term …God in Christ…the testimony of Jesus about it; “I and the Father are one thing.” John
10:30. And as such He said to all from heaven’s Throne “To him that overcometh (what ever) will I grant to sit
with me in my throne, even as I also overcame and am set down with my Father in his throne.” Fulfillment of …glorify
me with Thy ownself… God in Christ Jesus= ONE DEITY! It is why Paul wrote …hereto we know Jesus no more in the
flesh…
Of course; TRUTH BY TRUTH, IN TRUTH, INTO TRUTH …GOD IN CHRIST/CHRIST IN GOD… it is why Apostle John saw One
sitting on the Throne of God and the Lamb and wrote “God and His Christ.”
To read the Scriptures knowing that God is in Christ Jesus, is going been guided by truth into truth to know more truth.
ALELUYA! The result of that spiritual mountain claming is peace of Christ and joy full of glory.
If one of you may wonder why “the false brethren” preached what they did and acted as they did, invented what
they did trampling some of the Apostles’ Doctrine. Here it is their testimony! …Greek Philosophy is the knowledge
of what in reality existed and it is a clear perception of the truth… …the Apostles didn’t understood philosophy…
This is why “they” believed that philosophy was above Apostolic teaching and
so, Apostle Paul asserted: stay away from it! … (brethren) professing it; make shipwreck of the faith…a fact!
