The time for the “second witness has come;” I am referring to my previous writings in the statements about the interpolated words in Matthew 28:19 …”baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of The Son, and of The Holy Ghost….

I labored hard to bring it to a “crescendo with one witness”, (past journals) but Divine Providence offer me the second witness and it will back up strongly EXIBIT # 1.

Meditating and investigating and experiencing “soliloquies” .has been the name of the game that was not game at all; Church History has been my attraction, in previous reading materials of this caliber, has been mentioned about WARNINGS of some Apostles concerning “different teachings to come to pass contrary to the common faith after the Apostles’ departure”. Ephe. 4:14, 2^nd. Tim 4; 3,4.

Paul wrote to a young Minister to be watchful that not a “…new doctrine will be preached among them…” 1^st. Tim. 1:3. but it happened, a new doctrine was formulated 200- 300 A. D. by Greco-Roman scholars stained with “pagan philosophy”. Their NEW DOCTRINE= “…another Jesus. another Spirit, another gospel.”

Pope Pius X11, defending the new doctrines invented at that times and the scholars who did it, suggested to the Protestants to “…abhor that intemperate zeal which imagines that whatever is new should for that very reason be opposed or suspected.” But how it can be? It is the very core of the whole spiritual mess up; for Church History gets to be confusing at times because of who knows? With so many fingers in the butter.

In a nut sell, without spending time now in what I have said in my pass “Letters to Preachers only” (now available to the public), as fast- pass reference only I will mention things of a necessity to present Exhibit’s # 1, 2^nd. Witness.

It was said by a Catholic Scholar (I am unable to identify him), that the Hebrew writing of Matthew’s gospel was “…translated onto Greek, possibly during the lifetime of St. Matthew and got lost on the course of time. The Greek text however is in substantial conformity with the original.” (Take note of this, which happened in about 70 A. D.) Some scholars of today, venture to say that Matthew possibly wrote the Greek one too.

Let’s jump from that time 70 A.D. to 300 A.D. things that happened in between, were mentioned in previous

Letters; especially in “Acts in the Developing of the Doctrine of The Trinity and Matthew 28:19“. Now we will, see what took place between 300-325 and 340 A.D. At that time, Eusebious the pre-Universal Church Bishop of Caesarea doing his commentaries of Apostolic letters as they were at that time,300-315?A.D. working in The Greek text in the gospel of Matthew (remember that translation?) He quoting from the end of chapter 28, he did not mention that part of the so-called Great Commission as we read on the Bible versions of today.

And that happen not only once but various times and in various writings, which are available to the serious searcher of truth, But after the Council of Nicea 325 A.D.-340 A.D. his later writings do appear with the words …baptizing in the name of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Ghost; words that were interpolated and not by the hand of Eusebious; but by the pen of the translator who also had the privilege to translate the Greek

Gospel of Matthew to Latin. The translator was Father Donatus. Who performed the double interpolation!

From that Latin text, have come fort ALL BIBLE VERSIONS WITH THE STAIN OF THE INTERPOLATED WORDS IN MATTHEW 28:19. Donatus had the tendency to “alter” sentences to bring it to the level of the current doctrine of his day; pass records indicates it.

1. - Any trace of where or how the Hebrew gospel of Matthew got lost?

Ans.- The Hebrew writing of Matthew was seen in Cochin, India 140 A.D. among a Jewish congregation that was dissolved due to a very severe persecution by Indian tribes. Other historian says that “it” was taken to the Library in Caesarea about the end of 200 A.D. and others say that copies were done by groups or individuals. Also it is reported that the last section of the end of it was destroyed at later days after 325 A. D.

2. - So, one really does not know what Matthew really wrote at the end of his writing?

Ans.- A manuscript of it was …discovered in the middle of the nineteenth century by Constantine von Tischendorf at the monastery of St. Catherine in Mount Sinai.

3. - How valid it is?

Ans.- There were evidences that critics revised the text at various times.

4. - It is the one and only manuscript?

Ans.- No, there were others but this one seems to be the oldest one of all. (400-700 A.D.) Also there were done reproductions of them manuscripts, one especially displayed significant agreement with it, was done by a Jewish Doctor in Spain 1400 A.D. Of the later, there exist copies today translated to English.

5. - Are there any copies or manuscripts about the Greek gospel of Matthew?

Ans.- No that it is known.

6. - What happened to the Greek gospel of Matthew?

Ans.- Somehow it got placed in the same Library of Caesarea. According to historians, Eusebious had access to both of them. After that all is silence.

7. - When Father Damaso ordered the gathering of Apostolic writings, 334-380 A.D. which version of Matthew .was chosen to be as Divinely Inspired in order to be part of The to be called New Testament?

Ans.- None, The Latin version with the interpolated words on Chap. 28:19 was the chosen one.

8. - What in reality was written in both of them end of the Hebrew and Greek versions?

Ans.- JESUS DREW NEAR TO THEM AND SAID TO THEM TO ME HAS BEEN GIVEN ALL POWER IN HEAVEN AND EARTH GO AND TEACH THEM TO CARRY OUT ALL THE THINGS WHICH I HAVE COMMANDED YOU FOR EVER.

Remember that it was a Catholic Historian who said in writing “… the Greek text however is in substantial conformity with the original.”

9. - How the manuscript of the Hebrew gospel of Matthew came to be known and when?

Ans.- Modern scholars accidentally came across ancient Apostolic codices (1901- 1946)

10. - Is there another crime in the discovery of Matthew 28:19 crime? Ans.- “… the end of Matthew seems to been TORN OUT AND REMOVED FROM ALL CODICES OLDER THAN AD.400“. Gabriel Mendez. http://mendezbest.tripod.com/

P.S. This work is NO the result of my own investigating, it is however, the believing what others had found in the pass, it has been very rewarding “safari” to me for my growing “...In grace and in the knowledge of The Lord (Jesus) Christ.” ( JESUS=YEHOSHUA ) original Hebrew name, changed to Yeshu by His enemies; because Yeshu as common-word has this meaning (no well known in Christendom) “…may his name and memory be blotted out.” Well, having brought out to light what was on the dark; HIS NAME IN BAPTISM AND NOT HIS TITLES;THE ONE BAPTISM , is the baptism mentioned by the risen Savior. Mk. 16,15,16. Therefore; “…There is no other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved.” Acts 4:12. Apostle Paul wrote “…be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus and the things that thou hast heard of me…” “…There is One Lord, one faith, one baptism…” AND ONE DOCTRINE OF THE GRACE THAT IS BY FAITH; Apostle Peter wrote with a firm hand: to some of the beginning of the Church“…I HAVE WRITTEN BRIEFLY EXHORTING AND TESTIYING THAT THIS IS THE TRUE GRACE OF GOD, WHEREIN YE STAND“ 1^st Peter 5:12.

One more enlightened point: not only “they” did made appear the risen Savior saying something that He did not say; but get this: “…if any one shall not confess the Holy ever-virgin Mary, truly and properly the Mother of God. to be higher than every creature whether visible or invisible, and does not with sincere faith seeks her intercessions as of one having confidence in her access to our God…let him be anathema. C.C. A.D.754 Thus, “they” made of the risen Savior, an “inferior God” to “their Goddess”. G.M.